0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

½Å°æ¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ³ëÀΠȯÀÚ¸¦ À§ÇÑ ¼¶¸Á »çÁ¤µµ±¸ÀÇ ÀÓ»óÈ°¿ë °¡´É¼º Æò°¡

Evaluation of Clinical Usefulness of Delirium Assessment Tools for Elderly Patients after Neurosurgery

³ëÀΰ£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2015³â 17±Ç 1È£ p.38 ~ 47
KMID : 0895920150170010038
±è¼öÁ¤ ( Kim Su-Jung ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

¼ÛÁؾƠ( Song Jun-Ah ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the possibility for clinical use of delirium assessment tools, the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (Nu-DESC) and the Delirium Observation Screening Scale (DOS), for postoperative neurosurgery patients.

Methods: A sample of 100 elderly patients post neurosurgery was recruited from a neurosurgery ward in a university hospital located in Seoul, South Korea. Nurses (n=28) on the neurosurgery ward were asked to assess the participants using the Nu-DESC and the DOS. Based on the diagnosis of delirium made by a neuropsychiatrist, validity of the tools was evaluated. A questionnaire about ease of use of the tool was completed by the nurses.

Results: As for the reliability of the tools, Cronbach¡¯s ¥á was .79, and .95 for the Nu-DESC and the DOS, respectively. Both of the tools showed high levels of sensitivity and specificity. As for ease of use in the clinical setting, the Nu-DESC (mean=39.2¡¾4.82) had a higher (t=2.77, p=.01) score than the DOS (mean=37.39¡¾5.97).

Conclusion: Findings of this study confirmed that both the Nu-DESC and the DOS were highly reliable and valid tools to detect delirium in postoperative older neurosurgery patients, but the Nu-DESC was easier to use.
KeyWords
³ëÀÎ, ¼¶¸Á, ½Å°æ¿Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú
Aged, Delirium, Neurosurgery
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)